Enhabit, Inc. EHAB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1803737Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked May 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jun 2024 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Jun 2022 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Apr 2022 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Apr 2022 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | May 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jun 2024 | Text search only | 390 | 1.40 | 0.86 | 1.15 |
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Jun 2022 | Text search only | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.23 |
| Holland & Knight | Apr 2022 | Text search only | 413 | 1.16 | 0.82 | 1.21 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Apr 2022 | Text search only | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Igor KirmanWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Zachary S. PodolskyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew M. FreedmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jun 2024 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor KirmanWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Zachary S. PodolskyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrew M. FreedmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jun 2024 | Text search only | 52 | 1.61 | 0.72 | 0.76 |