Lightning eMotors, Inc. ZEV (last ticker on record)
CIK 1802749Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Dec 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Aug 2021 to Apr 2023
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in a filing · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Crowell & MoringFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.10× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley & Lardner | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Apr 2022 | Named in a filing | 127 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Crowell & Moring | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 59 | 1.69 | 2.10 | 1.49 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. WolfelFoley & LardnerFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Michael B. KirwanFoley & LardnerFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.68×
- Pamela L. MarcoglieseCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Sarah K. SolumDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2022 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- Benjamin G. GriebeDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- John F. MaselliDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Edward F. PetroskySidley AustinFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Michael P. HeinzSidley AustinFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. WolfelFoley & Lardner | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
| Michael B. KirwanFoley & Lardner | Aug 2022 | Named in a filing | 17 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 2.68 |
| Pamela L. MarcoglieseCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Apr 2022 | Named in a filing | 32 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Sarah K. SolumDavis Polk | Apr 2022 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.57 |
| Benjamin G. GriebeDLA Piper | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| John F. MaselliDLA Piper | Dec 2020 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA Piper | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.05 | 1.34 | 1.26 |
| Edward F. PetroskySidley Austin | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 45 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.44 |
| Michael P. HeinzSidley Austin | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 46 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.24 |