MSP Recovery, Inc. MSPR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1802450Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Jan 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2022 to Apr 2026
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Mar 2022 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & AxelrodFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- DALE S. BERGMANFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 2.18×
- Gutierrez Bergman Boulris, PLLCFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 2.83× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| DLA Piper | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Sidley Austin | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Akin Gump | Mar 2022 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 19 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| DALE S. BERGMAN | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 31 | 1.65 | 0.95 | 2.18 |
| Gutierrez Bergman Boulris, PLLC | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 15 | 2.49 | 2.83 | 0.60 |
| Holland & Knight | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeremy L. MooreBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Steven CannerBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Joshua M. SamekGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Corey R. ChiversWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Andrew LedbetterDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Stephen P. AlicantiDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Steven D. PidgeonDLA PiperFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 181 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Dale S. BergmanGutierrez Bergman Boulris, PLLCFirst linked Nov 2021 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.22× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy L. MooreBaker & McKenzie | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Steven CannerBaker & McKenzie | Nov 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 3.89 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Joshua M. SamekGreenberg Traurig | Jul 2022 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Corey R. ChiversWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Andrew LedbetterDLA Piper | Nov 2021 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Stephen P. AlicantiDLA Piper | Nov 2021 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Steven D. PidgeonDLA Piper | Nov 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.08 |
| Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 181 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 1.21 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Dale S. BergmanGutierrez Bergman Boulris, PLLC | Nov 2021 | Text search only | 19 | 2.22 | 1.29 | 1.34 |