Cano Health, Inc. CANOQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1800682Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Apr 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Sep 2021 to Feb 2024
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2023 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked May 2023 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hill Ward & HendersonFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2021 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2023 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Willkie Farr | May 2023 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Hill Ward & Henderson | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 34 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| White & Case | Apr 2021 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brian V. BrehenySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Amanda FensterWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Audrey S. LeighGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Heidi E. MayonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Jocelyn M. ArelGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Michael J. MinahanGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Russell L. LeafWillkie FarrFirst linked May 2023 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Dan EspinozaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Michael P. BrueckKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 206 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Michael J. MiesSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brian V. BrehenySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2024 | Named in a filing | 50 | 1.78 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Amanda FensterWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 4.80 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Audrey S. LeighGoodwin Procter | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Heidi E. MayonGoodwin Procter | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Jocelyn M. ArelGoodwin Procter | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Michael J. MinahanGoodwin Procter | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.61 | 0.91 | 1.80 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Peter S. SeligsonKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 73 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Russell L. LeafWillkie Farr | May 2023 | Text search only | 20 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Dan EspinozaGoodwin Procter | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 35 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Michael P. BrueckKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 14 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 206 | 1.74 | 0.21 | 0.99 |
| Michael J. MiesSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 57 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.36 |