RYTHM, Inc. RYM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1800637Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2021 to Oct 2024
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Sep 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Fennemore CraigFirst linked Sep 2024 · Named in a filing · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Lucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jan 2024 · Named in a filing · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Burns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Nutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Nov 2020 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2020 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Rice Reuther Sullivan & CarrollFirst linked Nov 2020 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Oct 2020 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Sep 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Fennemore Craig | Sep 2024 | Named in a filing | 99 | 1.13 | 0.59 | 1.10 |
| Lucosky Brookman LLP | Jan 2024 | Named in a filing | 223 | 1.24 | 2.05 | 1.19 |
| Burns & Levinson LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Nutter McClennen & Fish | Nov 2020 | Text search only | 88 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.85 |
| Perkins Coie | Nov 2020 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Rice Reuther Sullivan & Carroll | Nov 2020 | Text search only | 7 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Dechert LLP | Oct 2020 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Frank A. SegallBurns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Robert A. PetittBurns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- David J. LevineLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank A. SegallBurns & Levinson LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Robert A. PetittBurns & Levinson LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| David J. LevineLoeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 59 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |