ABBOTT LABORATORIES ABT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1800Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2020 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Winston & Strawn | Dec 2020 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Mayer Brown | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 148 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.43×
- Victor GoldfeldWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Arthur H. KohnCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Edward B. WinslowBenesch Friedlander Coplan & AronoffFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.08×
- Elizabeth C. KitslaarJones DayFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Charles W. Mulaney Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- Scott J. DavisMayer BrownFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Philip J. NiehoffMayer BrownFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.68× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Robert E. CurleyMayer BrownFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 110 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Edward D. HerlihyWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 148 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 0.43 |
| Victor GoldfeldWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Arthur H. KohnCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 2.10 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Edward B. WinslowBenesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 3.08 |
| Elizabeth C. KitslaarJones Day | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Charles W. Mulaney Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| Scott J. DavisMayer Brown | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Philip J. NiehoffMayer Brown | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 38 | 1.68 | 0.66 | 0.57 |
| Robert E. CurleyMayer Brown | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 2.33 |