Renovacor, Inc. RCOR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1799850Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2021 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Oct 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Jun 2021 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John T. HaggertyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Sarah AshfaqGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- William D. CollinsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 135 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Rachael M. BusheyGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 181 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. HaggertyGoodwin Procter | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Sarah AshfaqGoodwin Procter | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| William D. CollinsGoodwin Procter | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 135 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Rachael M. BusheyGoodwin Procter | Jun 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 181 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 1.21 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |