Calliditas Therapeutics AB
CIK 1795579Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Jun 2020 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Dec 2019 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Jul 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Goodwin Procter | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Jun 2020 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Dec 2019 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Katie KazemCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Janet HsuehGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James XuGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Joshua A. KaufmanCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Kristopher D. BrownGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Marc RechtCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.23× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Michael J. RosenbergLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Benjamin K. MarshGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2022 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2022 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA Piper | Jul 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Katie KazemCooley LLP | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Janet HsuehGoodwin Procter | Jul 2021 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James XuGoodwin Procter | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Joshua A. KaufmanCooley LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Kristopher D. BrownGoodwin Procter | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Marc RechtCooley LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 0.23 | 0.67 | 1.03 |
| Michael J. RosenbergLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Benjamin K. MarshGoodwin Procter | Jun 2022 | Text search only | 21 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Jun 2022 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |