CARROLS CORP
CIK 17927Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- ROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 2.29× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Baer Marks & UphamFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | Apr 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Haynes and Boone | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| ROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 40 | 0.82 | 2.29 | 1.80 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Akin Gump | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Baer Marks & Upham | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 27 | 0.89 | 1.31 | 1.23 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wayne A. WaldAkerman LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- David H. LandauROSENMAN & COLIN LLPFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.55×
- KEITH WASSERSTROMBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 4.32× · 95% wipeout 3.01×
- Kim E. RamseyAkin GumpFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne A. WaldAkerman LLP | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 1.83 | 1.45 | 0.62 |
| David H. LandauROSENMAN & COLIN LLP | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.55 |
| KEITH WASSERSTROMBaker & McKenzie | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 1.44 | 4.32 | 3.01 |
| Kim E. RamseyAkin Gump | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 5 | 4.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 |