Meiwu Technology Co Ltd WNW (last ticker on record)
CIK 1787803Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Mar 2026 to Nov 2026
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dacheng Law OfficesFirst linked Feb 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Hunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 251 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- China Commercial Law FirmFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Dec 2019 · Text search only · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dacheng Law Offices | Feb 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 1.71 | 0.69 | 1.09 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Hunter Taubman Fischer | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 251 | 1.06 | 1.77 | 1.12 |
| China Commercial Law Firm | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.08 | 1.03 | 1.02 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Dec 2019 | Text search only | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joan WuHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Benjamin TanSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.23× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Hunter Taubman Fischer LiHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Oct 2023 · Text search only · 309 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Jason YeOrtoli Rosenstadt LLPFirst linked Dec 2019 · Text search only · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joan WuHunter Taubman Fischer | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 60 | 1.07 | 0.89 | 1.34 |
| Benjamin TanSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Dec 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 1.20 | 1.23 | 1.40 |
| Hunter Taubman Fischer LiHunter Taubman Fischer | Oct 2023 | Text search only | 309 | 0.82 | 1.30 | 1.18 |
| Jason YeOrtoli Rosenstadt LLP | Dec 2019 | Text search only | 107 | 1.35 | 0.98 | 1.39 |