CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP CRS (last ticker on record)
CIK 17843Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Barley SnyderFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Stevens & LeeFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Jun 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Jul 2020 | Named in a filing | 154 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Bryan Cave | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Barley Snyder | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Stevens & Lee | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 127 | 1.08 | 0.74 | 0.59 |
| Dechert LLP | Jun 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott R. JonesPepper HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Robert A. FriedelPepper HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Barry M. AbelsonPepper HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Paul G. MattainiBarley SnyderFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott R. JonesPepper Hamilton | Oct 2016 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| Robert A. FriedelPepper Hamilton | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.33 | 1.59 | 1.61 |
| Barry M. AbelsonPepper Hamilton | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 21 | 0.36 | 1.00 | 1.28 |
| Paul G. MattainiBarley Snyder | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.70 |