36Kr Holdings Inc. KRKR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1779476Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Han KunFirst linked Aug 2025 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Jingtian & GongchengFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Oct 2019 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Han Kun | Aug 2025 | Named in a filing | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.85 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Jingtian & Gongcheng | Jun 2019 | Named in a filing | 154 | 1.10 | 0.63 | 1.14 |
| Maples and Calder | Jun 2019 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Oct 2019 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steve LinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in a filing · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2019 · Named in a filing · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Ran LiDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Li HeDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve LinKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2025 | Named in a filing | 63 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Oct 2019 | Named in a filing | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.27 | 1.55 | 1.59 |
| Ran LiDavis Polk | Sep 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Li HeDavis Polk | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.61 |