WM TECHNOLOGY, INC. MAPS (last ticker on record)

CIK 1779474Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restructuring
95% wipeout
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Restatement
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 4; Newest began May 2024
Largest fall in its shares: 98%; Jun 2021 to Oct 2026
Law firms: 6; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Apr 7, 2026Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 5, 2026Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 11, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 24, 2024SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
Sep 24, 2024SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
May 30, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 24, 2024Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 17, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 8, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 29, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 21, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 16, 2023A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 16, 2022Shares down 95% from their high
Dec 5, 2022Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 3, 2021Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 10, 2020A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Cooley LLP	Jan 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	1,634	0.71	0.44	1.24
Davis Polk	Jun 2019	Named in SEC correspondence	1,694	1.26	0.06	1.02
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Jun 2019	Named in SEC correspondence	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Covington & Burling	Jan 2021	Text search only	447	1.07	0.27	0.99
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP	Jan 2021	Text search only	1,125	1.23	0.20	0.96
Maples and Calder	Jun 2019	Text search only	1,144	0.95	0.26	0.92

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Dave PeinsippCooley LLP	Jul 2021	Named in a filing	43	1.69	0.00	1.73
David PeinsippCooley LLP	Jan 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	86	1.13	0.00	1.55
Garth OstermanCooley LLP	Jan 2021	Named in a filing	11	2.28	0.00	1.71
Kristin VanderPasCooley LLP	Jan 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	61	0.47	0.00	1.49
Lee HochbaumDavis Polk	Jan 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	28	0.93	0.00	1.99
Peter ByrneCooley LLP	Jan 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	29	1.54	0.00	1.08
Jonathan KoPaul Hastings	Jul 2019	Named in SEC correspondence	65	1.63	0.00	0.97
Deanna L. KirkpatrickDavis Polk	Jun 2019	Named in SEC correspondence	112	1.74	0.00	0.76
Derek J. DostalDavis Polk	Jun 2019	Named in SEC correspondence	114	1.03	0.00	1.22
Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Jun 2019	Named in SEC correspondence	206	1.74	0.21	0.99
Eric C. JensenCooley LLP	Jan 2021	Text search only	66	0.58	0.00	0.97