Huize Holding Ltd HUIZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1778982Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jun 2019 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Steve LinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Jing AnSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| Steve LinKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Jing AnSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 |