UpHealth, Inc. UPHL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1770141Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Sep 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2021 to Dec 2023
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dykema GossettFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.23× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Crowell & MoringFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 2.10× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dykema Gossett | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 115 | 0.95 | 0.23 | 0.87 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Crowell & Moring | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 59 | 1.69 | 2.10 | 1.49 |
| Duane Morris | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan SeemShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2023 · Named in a filing · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Thomas S. VaughnDykema GossettFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Brad RockDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2021 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.55× · 95% wipeout 4.64×
- John F. MaselliDLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.34× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Kate L. BechenDykema GossettFirst linked Jun 2022 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Alan I. AnnexGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2019 · Text search only · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Jason T. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 2019 · Text search only · 120 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan SeemShearman & Sterling | Apr 2023 | Named in a filing | 34 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Sanjay M. ShirodkarDLA Piper | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Thomas S. VaughnDykema Gossett | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Brad RockDLA Piper | Apr 2021 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 2.55 | 4.64 |
| John F. MaselliDLA Piper | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| Jeffrey C. SelmanDLA Piper | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.05 | 1.34 | 1.26 |
| Kate L. BechenDykema Gossett | Jun 2022 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Alan I. AnnexGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2019 | Text search only | 153 | 0.55 | 0.24 | 1.15 |
| Jason T. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Apr 2019 | Text search only | 120 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 1.11 |