Sana Biotechnology, Inc. SANA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1770121Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Feb 2021 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2020 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Dec 2020 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Goodwin Procter | Dec 2020 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Dec 2020 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Phillip McGillWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Jennifer KnappWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Tony JeffriesWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Mar 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Brian J. CuneoLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Charles S. KimCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Kristin VanderPasCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Gregg L. KatzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2020 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2020 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Sonya EricksonCooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2020 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phillip McGillWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Jennifer KnappWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Tony JeffriesWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Mar 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.24 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Brian J. CuneoLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Charles S. KimCooley LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Kristin VanderPasCooley LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Gregg L. KatzGoodwin Procter | Dec 2020 | Text search only | 20 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Kingsley L. TaftGoodwin Procter | Dec 2020 | Text search only | 43 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Sonya EricksonCooley LLP | Dec 2020 | Text search only | 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.04 |