Luckin Coffee Inc. LKNCY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1767582Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Jan 2020 to Jun 2020
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 20-F (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Oct 2021 · Named in a filing · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked May 2019 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Apr 2019 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- King & WoodFirst linked Feb 2019 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Oct 2021 | Named in a filing | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Feb 2019 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | May 2019 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Norton Rose | Apr 2019 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| King & Wood | Feb 2019 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked May 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Li HeDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Ran LiDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2019 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James C. LinDavis Polk | May 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Li HeDavis Polk | Feb 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Ran LiDavis Polk | Apr 2019 | Text search only | 13 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 0.64 |