SNDL Inc. SNDL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1766600Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2019 to Oct 2026
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Allen Overy Shearman Sterling US LLPFirst linked Mar 2025 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Jul 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2020 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Borden Ladner Gervais LLPFirst linked Jul 2019 · Text search only · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Burnet Duckworth & PalmerFirst linked Jul 2019 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- CMS Cameron McKennaFirst linked Jul 2019 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Jul 2019 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Jul 2019 · Text search only · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Gowling WLG (Canada) LLPFirst linked Jul 2019 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 2.46× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Miller ThomsonFirst linked Jul 2019 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Jul 2019 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allen Overy Shearman Sterling US LLP | Mar 2025 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Jul 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Apr 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Torys LLP | Apr 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
| Goodwin Procter | Dec 2020 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Jul 2019 | Text search only | 78 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Burnet Duckworth & Palmer | Jul 2019 | Text search only | 39 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| CMS Cameron McKenna | Jul 2019 | Text search only | 32 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Jul 2019 | Text search only | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Fasken Martineau | Jul 2019 | Text search only | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP | Jul 2019 | Text search only | 26 | 0.67 | 2.46 | 0.99 |
| Miller Thomson | Jul 2019 | Text search only | 49 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.39 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Jul 2019 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason R. LehnerShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 1.82× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Rob LandoOsler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Apr 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason R. LehnerShearman & Sterling | Apr 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.90 | 1.82 | 0.72 |
| Rob LandoOsler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Apr 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 1.86 |