Lantern Pharma Inc. LTRN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1763950Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Mar 2021 to Nov 2026
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Dechert LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Text search only · 434 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Text search only · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Blank Rome | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Dechert LLP | Jan 2020 | Text search only | 434 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.96 |
| McGuireWoods LLP | Jan 2020 | Text search only | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel K. DonahueGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Brad L. ShiffmanBlank RomeFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Daniel B. EngLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Scott E. BartelLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- David E. SchulmanDechert LLPFirst linked Jan 2020 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel K. DonahueGreenberg Traurig | Dec 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.10 | 0.38 | 1.68 |
| Brad L. ShiffmanBlank Rome | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.33 | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| Daniel B. EngLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.38 | 1.41 | 1.19 |
| Scott E. BartelLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Jan 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.36 | 0.73 | 0.81 |
| David E. SchulmanDechert LLP | Jan 2020 | Text search only | 16 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.59 |