Olema Pharmaceuticals, Inc. OLMA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1750284Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Dec 2020 to May 2022
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Choate Hall & StewartFirst linked Nov 2020 · Text search only · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Sep 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Choate Hall & Stewart | Nov 2020 | Text search only | 142 | 0.60 | 0.75 | 1.29 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Julia BoeschCooley LLPFirst linked Mar 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Sara SemnaniCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Dave PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Denny WonCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Jodie M. BourdetCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
- Kristin VanderPasCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia BoeschCooley LLP | Mar 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Sara SemnaniCooley LLP | Nov 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Dave PeinsippCooley LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Denny WonCooley LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| Jodie M. BourdetCooley LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 2.00 |
| Kristin VanderPasCooley LLP | Sep 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 1.49 |