Greenlane Holdings, Inc. GNLN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1743745Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Oct 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2019 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Dentons CanadaFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Potter Anderson & CorroonFirst linked May 2021 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 2021 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Dickinson WrightFirst linked Nov 2018 · Text search only · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.73× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Jones DayFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Aug 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Morrison & Foerster | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Dentons Canada | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Pryor Cashman | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Mayer Brown | May 2021 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Potter Anderson & Corroon | May 2021 | Text search only | 127 | 1.41 | 0.45 | 0.87 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 2021 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Dickinson Wright | Nov 2018 | Text search only | 104 | 1.20 | 1.73 | 1.43 |
| Jones Day | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Arthur S. MarcusSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Jesse L. BlueSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- R. John HensleyMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Oct 2022 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- David P. SlotkinMorrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2021 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- John HensleyMorrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Justin R. SalonMorrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Eric M. HelligePryor CashmanFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Larry W. NishnickDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Patrick J. O MalleyDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2019 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.16×
- Clint J. GageRoetzel & AndressFirst linked Nov 2018 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 3.11× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arthur S. MarcusSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Aug 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 75 | 1.11 | 0.73 | 1.39 |
| Jesse L. BlueSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Aug 2024 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| R. John HensleyMorrison & Foerster | Oct 2022 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| David P. SlotkinMorrison & Foerster | May 2021 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| John HensleyMorrison & Foerster | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Justin R. SalonMorrison & Foerster | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Eric M. HelligePryor Cashman | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.02 | 1.64 | 1.65 |
| Larry W. NishnickDLA Piper | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 4.03 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Patrick J. O MalleyDLA Piper | Mar 2019 | Text search only | 11 | 1.94 | 0.00 | 4.16 |
| Clint J. GageRoetzel & Andress | Nov 2018 | Text search only | 16 | 1.87 | 3.11 | 1.89 |