Zekelman Industries, Inc.
CIK 1742916Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & Hostetler | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.39 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 155 | 1.15 | 0.16 | 0.74 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.04 |
| Ballard Spahr | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.78 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.85 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. HarringtonBaker & HostetlerFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- John M. GherleinBaker & HostetlerFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. HarringtonBaker & Hostetler | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| John M. GherleinBaker & Hostetler | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.68 |