Cheer Holding, Inc. CHR (last ticker on record)

CIK 1738758Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 0; None on record
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 13; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Mar 9, 2020Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Mar 4, 2020Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Hogan Lovells US LLP	Sep 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	487	0.96	0.26	0.85
Latham & Watkins LLP	Aug 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP	Oct 2019	Named in SEC correspondence	33	1.23	0.00	0.79
Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Apr 2018	Named in SEC correspondence	963	0.96	1.12	1.21
Maples and Calder	Apr 2018	Named in a filing	1,144	0.95	0.26	0.92
Jingtian & Gongcheng Attorneys at Law	May 2024	Text search only	79	1.11	1.13	0.88
Han Kun	Aug 2022	Text search only	178	1.08	0.35	0.87
Mourant Ozannes (Cayman)	Aug 2022	Text search only	54	0.76	0.00	0.63
Goodwin Procter	Oct 2019	Text search only	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Grandall Law Firm	Oct 2019	Text search only	36	0.69	0.00	1.34
Graubard Miller	Apr 2018	Text search only	418	0.92	0.75	1.16

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Dale S. BergmanGutierrez Bergman Boulris, PLLC	Jun 2025	Named in SEC correspondence	19	2.22	1.29	1.34
Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis	Aug 2022	Named in SEC correspondence	40	0.80	0.00	0.67
Stephanie TangShearman & Sterling	Aug 2022	Named in a filing	22	1.49	1.83	0.50
John P. YungLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP	Feb 2020	Named in SEC correspondence	13	0.00	0.00	0.53
Jeffrey W. RubinEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Oct 2019	Named in SEC correspondence	33	1.98	0.00	1.46
Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Oct 2019	Named in SEC correspondence	58	0.95	1.58	0.98
Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Apr 2018	Named in SEC correspondence	338	0.95	0.66	0.95
Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Apr 2018	Named in SEC correspondence	416	0.78	0.42	1.04
Benjamin YaoLoeb & Loeb LLP	Aug 2025	Text search only	20	0.00	0.00	0.27
Daniel B. EngLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP	Jun 2024	Text search only	38	1.38	1.41	1.19
Douglas C. FreemanO Melveny & Myers LLP	Oct 2019	Text search only	12	0.90	0.00	0.49
Matthew A. GrayEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP	Oct 2019	Text search only	42	1.43	0.00	1.45
Scott E. BartelLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP	Oct 2019	Text search only	15	1.36	0.73	0.81