Cambium Networks Corp CMBMF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1738177Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Sep 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2021 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sidley AustinFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked May 2018 · Named in a filing · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Neal Gerber & EisenbergFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2018 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sidley Austin | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | May 2018 | Named in a filing | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.82 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Neal Gerber & Eisenberg | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 56 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| DLA Piper | May 2018 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Catherine D. DoxseeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 5.72×
- Helen TheungSidley AustinFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
- Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Martin A. WellingtonSidley AustinFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.46×
- Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked May 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine D. DoxseeWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.74 | 0.00 | 5.72 |
| Helen TheungSidley Austin | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 1.71 |
| Jeffrey D. SaperWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 1.24 | 0.83 | 1.51 |
| Martin A. WellingtonSidley Austin | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 2.46 |
| Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | May 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.51 | 1.13 | 1.93 |