Canopy Growth Corp CGC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1737927Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began May 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2021 to Oct 2026
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Cassels Brock & BlackwellFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Feb 2021 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- LaBarge WeinsteinFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Nov 2018 · Text search only · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Cassels Brock & Blackwell | Feb 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 102 | 0.99 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Feb 2021 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| LaBarge Weinstein | Nov 2018 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Nov 2018 | Text search only | 155 | 1.19 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan ShermanCassels Brock & BlackwellFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Keith D. PisaniPaul HastingsFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan ShermanCassels Brock & Blackwell | Dec 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 3.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Keith D. PisaniPaul Hastings | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.80 |