NIO Inc. NIO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1736541Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Han KunFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Sep 2018 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Sep 2018 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Grandall Law FirmFirst linked Apr 2018 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2018 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Han Kun | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.85 |
| Maples and Calder | Apr 2018 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Sep 2018 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Sep 2018 | Text search only | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Grandall Law Firm | Apr 2018 | Text search only | 36 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| White & Case | Apr 2018 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Will H. CaiCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Jing AnSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2022 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Will H. CaiCooley LLP | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 73 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Jing AnSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2022 | Text search only | 34 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 |