Puxin Ltd
CIK 1726189Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Jun 2018 · Text search only · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2018 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Mar 2018 · Text search only · 258 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Han KunFirst linked Feb 2018 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2018 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Tian Yuan Law FirmFirst linked Feb 2018 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 2.01× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2018 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Jun 2018 | Text search only | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.80 |
| White & Case | Jun 2018 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Mar 2018 | Text search only | 258 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Han Kun | Feb 2018 | Text search only | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.85 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2018 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Tian Yuan Law Firm | Feb 2018 | Text search only | 75 | 1.99 | 2.01 | 1.37 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2018 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Li HeDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Dan OuyangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2018 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Li HeDavis Polk | Feb 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Dan OuyangWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2018 | Text search only | 41 | 1.29 | 2.60 | 1.78 |