BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. BTAI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1720893Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Aug 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2020 to Sep 2026
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Nov 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2023 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2018 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Wiggin and DanaFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Nov 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2023 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Cooley LLP | Feb 2018 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Wiggin and Dana | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 56 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 1.37 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. RosenbergLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Emily J. JohnsHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Jan 2025 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- N. Danny ShulmanHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Ellen SmileyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard MullinFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Keith L. HalverstamLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Stephen A. CohenSheppard MullinFirst linked Nov 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.07× · Went dark 3.49× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Lisa FirenzeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Nov 2023 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. RosenbergLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2026 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.77 |
| Emily J. JohnsHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Jan 2025 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.52 |
| N. Danny ShulmanHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Nov 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.45 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
| Ellen SmileyLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Jeffrey J. FesslerSheppard Mullin | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.86 | 0.37 | 1.21 |
| Keith L. HalverstamLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.62 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Stephen A. CohenSheppard Mullin | Nov 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 36 | 2.07 | 3.49 | 1.79 |
| Lisa FirenzeWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Nov 2023 | Text search only | 19 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.91 |