Gates Industrial Corp Ltd. GTES (last ticker on record)
CIK 1718512Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Travers SmithFirst linked Jan 2018 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Oct 2017 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Oct 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Travers Smith | Jan 2018 | Text search only | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Thompson & Knight | Oct 2017 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan R. OznerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Michael KaplanDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2017 · Text search only · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan R. OznerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward P. Tolley IIISimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 58 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Michael KaplanDavis Polk | Oct 2017 | Text search only | 112 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.89 |