TFI TAB GIDA YATIRIMLARI A.S.
CIK 1714768Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 259 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- White & CaseFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Sep 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 0.98 |
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 259 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Willkie Farr | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.82 |
| White & Case | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David B. RockwellSullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 |