SOGOU INC. SOGO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1713947Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Global Law OfficeFirst linked Aug 2017 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2017 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Davis Polk | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.30 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| Global Law Office | Aug 2017 | Text search only | 67 | 1.06 | 0.80 | 1.24 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2017 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Li HeDavis PolkFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Timothy B. BancroftGoulston & StorrsFirst linked Aug 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Li HeDavis Polk | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Timothy B. BancroftGoulston & Storrs | Aug 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.91 | 1.92 | 0.64 |