LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. LX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1708259Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- JunHe LLPFirst linked Jul 2017 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maples and Calder | Jul 2017 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.85 |
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| JunHe LLP | Jul 2017 | Text search only | 49 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew D. BersaniShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Will H. CaiCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Nov 2017 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew D. BersaniShearman & Sterling | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Will H. CaiCooley LLP | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 73 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Nov 2017 | Text search only | 60 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.20 |