STR Sub Inc. STR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1703785Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- White & CaseFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Ledgewood, PCFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| White & Case | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Ledgewood, PC | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael GilsonDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William H. AaronsonDavis PolkFirst linked Dec 2022 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Scott D. RubinskyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Nick S. DhesiLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Ryan J. LynchLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.84×
- William N. Finnegan IVLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 206 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.74× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Jonathan KoPaul HastingsFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 65 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Mark E. RosensteinLedgewood, PCFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Edward J. LeeWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2018 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael GilsonDavis Polk | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William H. AaronsonDavis Polk | Dec 2022 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Scott D. RubinskyVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Nick S. DhesiLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 2.37 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Ryan J. LynchLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.84 |
| William N. Finnegan IVLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.57 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 110 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Gregg A. NoelSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 206 | 1.74 | 0.21 | 0.99 |
| Jonathan KoPaul Hastings | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 65 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Mark E. RosensteinLedgewood, PC | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Edward J. LeeWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2018 | Text search only | 21 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 |