Sea Ltd SE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1703399Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Rajah & TannFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Oct 2017 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Han KunFirst linked Oct 2017 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Sep 2017 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 245 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Maples and Calder | Apr 2017 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Rajah & Tann | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Oct 2017 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| Han Kun | Oct 2017 | Text search only | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.85 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Sep 2017 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.81 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.28 |
| Allen & Overy | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 245 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 0.63 |
| Herbert Smith | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Hunton & Williams | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dwight S. YooSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.89× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Ben JamesKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.36×
- Benjamin SuKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dwight S. YooSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 1.23 | 1.89 | 0.82 |
| Ben JamesKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.36 |
| Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.96 |