Amber International Holding Ltd AMBR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1697818Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2021 to Apr 2024
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Davis PolkFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Jul 2025 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Taylor WessingFirst linked Jul 2025 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Michelman & RobinsonFirst linked Dec 2023 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2017 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Davis Polk | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Jul 2025 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.02 |
| Taylor Wessing | Jul 2025 | Text search only | 36 | 0.60 | 1.72 | 1.10 |
| Michelman & Robinson | Dec 2023 | Text search only | 17 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Paul Hastings | Dec 2017 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Denise ShiuCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked May 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denise ShiuCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James C. LinDavis Polk | May 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.97 |