Stealth BioTherapeutics Corp MITO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1696396Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Mar 2019 to May 2022
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Walkers (Cayman)First linked Feb 2019 · Named in a filing · 191 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Feb 2019 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Feb 2019 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Feb 2019 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Oct 2018 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Walkers (Cayman) | Feb 2019 | Named in a filing | 191 | 1.25 | 0.26 | 0.80 |
| Cooley LLP | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.21 |
| HALE AND DORR | Oct 2018 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Foley & Lardner | Feb 2019 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.98 |
| Foley Hoag | Feb 2019 | Text search only | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.14 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Feb 2019 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Oct 2018 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.30 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2018 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan S. BrewerPaul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joshua M. ZachariahKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Sean M. DonahuePaul HastingsFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Gregg L. KatzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Christopher D. Barnstable-BrownWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Rosemary G. ReillyWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Haim ZaltzmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2018 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan S. BrewerPaul Hastings | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joshua M. ZachariahKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Sean M. DonahuePaul Hastings | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Gregg L. KatzGoodwin Procter | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| Christopher D. Barnstable-BrownWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Rosemary G. ReillyWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Steven D. SingerWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 42 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Haim ZaltzmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2018 | Text search only | 27 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.59 |