Neon Therapeutics, Inc. NTGN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1694187Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Apr 2020 · Named in a filing · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2018 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Apr 2020 | Named in a filing | 127 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Goodwin Procter | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2018 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jesse NevarezGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jun 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Laurie A. BurlingameGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 109 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2019 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jesse NevarezGoodwin Procter | Jun 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin Procter | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Laurie A. BurlingameGoodwin Procter | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Mitchell S. BloomGoodwin Procter | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 109 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Jul 2019 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |