High Templar Tech Ltd HTT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1692705Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Oct 2017 to Mar 2022
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- White & CaseFirst linked Oct 2017 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Aug 2017 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2017 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- King & WoodFirst linked Aug 2017 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Tian Yuan Law FirmFirst linked Feb 2017 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 2.01× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| White & Case | Oct 2017 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Aug 2017 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2017 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| King & Wood | Aug 2017 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
| Tian Yuan Law Firm | Feb 2017 | Text search only | 75 | 1.99 | 2.01 | 1.34 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Marisa D. StavenasSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2026 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Yi GaoSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Benjamin SuKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Steve LinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2017 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marisa D. StavenasSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2026 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Yi GaoSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.28 | 1.55 | 1.65 |
| Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
| Steve LinKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2017 | Text search only | 36 | 1.16 | 0.85 | 1.41 |