CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC. STZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 16918Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & Schulte LLPFirst linked Oct 2025 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Harter Secrest & Emery LLPFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Nov 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Potter Anderson & CorroonFirst linked Aug 2022 · Text search only · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Kurzman Eisenberg Corbin & Lever, LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Phillips LytleFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Schulte LLP | Oct 2025 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Nixon Peabody | Oct 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Harter Secrest & Emery LLP | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 77 | 1.35 | 0.33 | 0.70 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Nov 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Potter Anderson & Corroon | Aug 2022 | Text search only | 127 | 1.41 | 0.45 | 0.87 |
| Kurzman Eisenberg Corbin & Lever, LLP | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| Phillips Lytle | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 22 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DAVID M. SILKWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Victor GoldfeldWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Carlo ZenknerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Jennifer LeeKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Heidi SteeleMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Apr 2020 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Lloyd H. SpencerNixon PeabodyFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- David A. CifrinoMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Roger W. ByrdNixon PeabodyFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.63×
- John C. PartiganNixon PeabodyFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Bernard S. KramerMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.09×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jul 2022 · Text search only · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Daniel J. ZubkoffCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2001 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVID M. SILKWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Victor GoldfeldWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Sep 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Carlo ZenknerKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.47 | — | 1.41 |
| Jennifer LeeKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Heidi SteeleMcDermott Will & Emery | Apr 2020 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.86 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Lloyd H. SpencerNixon Peabody | Aug 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 1.47 |
| David A. CifrinoMcDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2012 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.51 |
| Roger W. ByrdNixon Peabody | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.63 |
| John C. PartiganNixon Peabody | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Bernard S. KramerMcDermott Will & Emery | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 2.09 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jul 2022 | Text search only | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Daniel J. ZubkoffCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2001 | Text search only | 17 | 1.38 | 1.69 | 0.58 |