NEWMARK GROUP, INC. NMRK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1690680Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Maynard Cooper & GaleFirst linked May 2024 · Text search only · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2019 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Maynard Cooper & Gale | May 2024 | Text search only | 43 | 1.63 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2019 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey A. LetalienGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Howard A. KennyMorgan LewisFirst linked Jan 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.22×
- Christopher T. JensenMorgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey A. LetalienGoodwin Procter | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Howard A. KennyMorgan Lewis | Jan 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.22 |
| Christopher T. JensenMorgan Lewis | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 110 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.52 |