Foundation Building Materials, Inc. FBM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1688941Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 165 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Davies Ward Phillips & VinebergFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Ice MillerFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Lawson LundellFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 0.19×
- Macpherson Leslie & TyermanFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Rogers TowersFirst linked Dec 2016 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.87×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 165 | 1.18 | 1.37 | 1.37 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 94 | 0.35 | 0.21 | 1.11 |
| Davis Polk | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Ice Miller | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Lawson Lundell | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 27 | 0.35 | 0.84 | 0.19 |
| Macpherson Leslie & Tyerman | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 14 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Rogers Towers | Dec 2016 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.87 |
| Norton Rose | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Thompson & Knight | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Mark L. SkaistStradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 2.52× · 95% wipeout 2.14×
- Ryan C. WilkinsStradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Aug 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.98×
- Jeffrey A. ChapmanGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter W. WardleGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Samantha H. CrispinBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark L. SkaistStradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Aug 2019 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.43 | 2.52 | 2.14 |
| Ryan C. WilkinsStradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Aug 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.54 | 0.00 | 1.98 |
| Jeffrey A. ChapmanGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peter W. WardleGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Samantha H. CrispinBaker Botts L.L.P. | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 2.47 | 0.00 | 1.07 |