Phillips Edison Grocery Center REIT III, Inc.
CIK 1688016Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked May 2017 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Ice MillerFirst linked May 2017 · Text search only · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PCFirst linked Feb 2017 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Feb 2017 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Feb 2017 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2017 · Text search only · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Nelson MullinsFirst linked Feb 2017 · Text search only · 302 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | May 2017 | Text search only | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.85 |
| Ice Miller | May 2017 | Text search only | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.88 |
| Alston & Bird | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.76 |
| Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC | Feb 2017 | Text search only | 149 | 0.72 | 1.18 | 1.13 |
| Bryan Cave | Feb 2017 | Text search only | 471 | 1.08 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| King & Spalding | Feb 2017 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.01 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2017 | Text search only | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Nelson Mullins | Feb 2017 | Text search only | 302 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert H. BergdoltDLA Piper | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.94 |