TDH Holdings, Inc. PETZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1684425Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McGuireWoods LLPFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in a filing · 358 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- KaiTong Law FirmFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McGuireWoods LLP | Feb 2022 | Named in a filing | 358 | 0.97 | 0.85 | 1.10 |
| KaiTong Law Firm | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Schiff Hardin | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.24 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.80 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew B. ChmielK&L GatesFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- F. Alec OrudjevSchiff HardinFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Joel D. MayersohnAtlas Pearlman, P.A.First linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.75× · Went dark 1.44× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Ralph V. De MartinoArentFox Schiff LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 78 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 1.20× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Alec OrudjevSchiff HardinFirst linked Mar 2017 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.44× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew B. ChmielK&L Gates | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| F. Alec OrudjevSchiff Hardin | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.00 | 1.18 | 1.20 |
| Joel D. MayersohnAtlas Pearlman, P.A. | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.75 | 1.44 | 1.47 |
| Ralph V. De MartinoArentFox Schiff LLP | Mar 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 78 | 0.51 | 1.20 | 1.38 |
| Alec OrudjevSchiff Hardin | Mar 2017 | Text search only | 30 | 0.00 | 1.44 | 1.62 |