Onar Holding Corp ONAR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1682265Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Mar 2026 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 2025 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Smith EilersFirst linked Aug 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 6.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- The Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & Hostetler | Mar 2026 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jul 2025 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Smith Eilers | Aug 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 6.35 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| The Loev Law Firm, PC | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 1.27 | 1.16 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey R. ShumanJenner & BlockFirst linked Jul 2025 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.66×
- William Robinson EilersEilers Law GroupFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- David M. LoevThe Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 83 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- John S. GilliesThe Loev Law Firm, PCFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey R. ShumanJenner & Block | Jul 2025 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 2.66 |
| William Robinson EilersEilers Law Group | Jul 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 1.26 | 1.24 | 0.71 |
| David M. LoevThe Loev Law Firm, PC | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 83 | 1.35 | 1.43 | 1.12 |
| John S. GilliesThe Loev Law Firm, PC | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 0.80 | 1.66 | 1.41 |