iFresh Inc IFMK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1681941Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 4
- Newest began Sep 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2017 to Dec 2021
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ortoli Rosenstadt LLPFirst linked Jul 2019 · Named in a filing · 138 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Hunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in a filing · 251 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ortoli Rosenstadt LLP | Jul 2019 | Named in a filing | 138 | 1.50 | 1.29 | 1.37 |
| Hunter Taubman Fischer | Jun 2019 | Named in a filing | 251 | 1.06 | 1.77 | 1.12 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| Davis Polk | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| Pryor Cashman | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William S. RosenstadtOrtoli Rosenstadt LLPFirst linked Jul 2019 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 181 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Lawrence S. VenickLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Text search only · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Elizabeth Fei ChenPryor CashmanFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 1.32× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William S. RosenstadtOrtoli Rosenstadt LLP | Jul 2019 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 1.46 |
| Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 181 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 1.21 |
| Lawrence S. VenickLoeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 164 | 0.85 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Apr 2018 | Text search only | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |
| Elizabeth Fei ChenPryor Cashman | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 39 | 1.04 | 1.32 | 1.39 |