TechnipFMC plc FTI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1681459Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2018 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 1,211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2018 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Sidley Austin | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 1,211 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Julia A. ThompsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Christopher R. DrewryLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 135 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Bradley C. FarisLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.24×
- Mark D. GersteinLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia A. ThompsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Christopher R. DrewryLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2018 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ryan J. MaiersonLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 135 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 1.27 |
| Bradley C. FarisLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 38 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| Mark D. GersteinLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 38 | 0.99 | 0.00 | 0.71 |