HF Foods Group Inc. HFFG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1680873Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Jun 2019 to Feb 2026
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Sep 2025 · Named in a filing · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Feb 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | Sep 2025 | Named in a filing | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Arnold & Porter | Feb 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher P. PetersonArnold & PorterFirst linked Jun 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.69×
- Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 181 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Lawrence S. VenickLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Jun 2019 · Text search only · 391 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.93× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher P. PetersonArnold & Porter | Jun 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 1.69 |
| Giovanni CarusoLoeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 181 | 1.06 | 0.43 | 1.21 |
| Lawrence S. VenickLoeb & Loeb LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 164 | 0.85 | 0.42 | 1.12 |
| Mitchell S. NussbaumLoeb & Loeb LLP | Jun 2019 | Text search only | 391 | 0.98 | 0.93 | 1.21 |