Newater Technology, Inc. NEWA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1678022Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- MagStone Law, LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- KaiTong Law FirmFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Mar 2021 · Text search only · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Pearlman Law GroupFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Pearlman Schneider LLPFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.79× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MagStone Law, LLP | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| K&L Gates | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| KaiTong Law Firm | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Mar 2021 | Text search only | 238 | 1.34 | 1.02 | 0.76 |
| DLA Piper | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Pearlman Law Group | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Pearlman Schneider LLP | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 32 | 1.34 | 1.79 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James ChangDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Yue Mark LiMagStone Law, LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 5.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bradley A. HanebergKaufman & Canoles, P.C.First linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Damien A. GriersonK&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Matthew B. ChmielK&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Matthew OgurickK&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Mark LiMagStone Law, LLPFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James ChangDLA Piper | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Yue Mark LiMagStone Law, LLP | Jan 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 5.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bradley A. HanebergKaufman & Canoles, P.C. | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.37 | 0.69 | 1.19 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Damien A. GriersonK&L Gates | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Matthew B. ChmielK&L Gates | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Matthew OgurickK&L Gates | Jul 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 0.63 | 1.33 | 1.25 |
| Mark LiMagStone Law, LLP | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 10 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 0.81 |