Motif Bio plc MTFB (last ticker on record)
CIK 1674657Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Oct 2017 to Nov 2019
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Reed SmithFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Jul 2016 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Morrison & Foerster | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
| Reed Smith | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.12 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Jul 2016 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew P. GilbertDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Brian HirshbergMayer BrownFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Wendy GrassoReed SmithFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.97×
- Anna T. PinedoMorrison & FoersterFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Aron IzowerReed SmithFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Joseph SmithLKP Global Law, LLPFirst linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 3.01× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew P. GilbertDLA Piper | Dec 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.65 | 0.50 | 0.98 |
| Brian HirshbergMayer Brown | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Wendy GrassoReed Smith | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 1.97 |
| Anna T. PinedoMorrison & Foerster | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Aron IzowerReed Smith | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 2.15 | 1.47 | 1.80 |
| Joseph SmithLKP Global Law, LLP | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 12 | 0.82 | 3.01 | 2.22 |