Conyers Park Acquisition Corp. CPAA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1672985Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked May 2017 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Fortis Law PartnersFirst linked Apr 2017 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | May 2017 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Fortis Law Partners | Apr 2017 | Text search only | 5 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael MovsovichKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Michael A. MiduraEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael MovsovichKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2017 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Michael A. MiduraEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.71 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |